(Free 3-day trial)Subscribe here. Lets talk grain. That way, you're a mile away and you've got their shoes.". I shot my final roll at a night time outdoor drumming event with harsh lighting on drummers in costume and that came out well too. Cheers! And while you cannot buy D-23, you can buy it in kits from Photographers formulary or mix it up yourself. If youre a fan of a particular era of films and love that high-speed crunch and grain that youd find in a 1970s roll of Kodak Tri-X and are okay with a bit of speed loss or an increase of grain plus a bit of soft mush and a mid-to-low contrast than Fomapan 400 might be a film to try. Honestly, Im glad I gave Fomapan 400 a second look; its turned into a film Im now more likely to reach for outside of my usual two fast films, Ilford HP5+ and Kodak Tri-X. Why experiment with something new when I am comfortable with Kentmere? C. Continuous gentle rocking face up (single neg) in a tray. Ich wrde HP5 in D76 nehmen und den Silvermax- Entwickler mir schenken. To me, the film seems muddy. You know what they basically said? I was reading an article that Simon King wrote on 35mmc where he shot fomapan 400 at 200. Now that Im retired, I like instant gratification slip into the darkroom whenever I need to process filmpour, dilute, temp check, time/temp compensate and process. Also, it seemed I could never get Fomapan to dry cleanly no matter what I tried. All photos were given the same amount of sharpening and then inverted after cleaning up any lingering dust with the spot healing tool. Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience-, 5 Frames with the Olympus XA & Ektar 100 (at EI400) by Simon King, Frames with the Mighty Hasselblad XPAN By Yul Vazquez, 5 Frames on Frozen Lake Winnipeg with Rollei 25 RPX By Christopf Rampitsch, 5 Frames With Fomapan 400 "Action" at EI1600, Developed as 3200 - by Simon King - 35mmc, First Impressions: A Fomapan 400 Review - The Analogue Experience, Fomapan 400 & Kentmere 400 Review - Battle of the Budgets - by Simon King - 35mmc, Video: Chatting to Ashley Carr in Stourport (part 2), 5 frames of the Extinction Rebellion with a Leica R5 - by Michael Scott, Camera, Lens, Film and Peripheral Kit Reviews, Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience. Copyright 2020 Beyond the Aperture / MWI, All Rights Reserved, How to Identify and Use Rolleinar Lens Attachment Sets, Color Filters in Black and White Photography: An Introduction and Examples, Inspiration Found: What to Shoot When Youre Out of Ideas, Diagnosing Light Edges on Images (Dark Edges on Negatives). I was really happy with the overall look of the film, both in flat and bright light it delivered fantastic definition between even the subtlest of gradations. Kentmere is the easier and faster film, i have been able to get as good results as HP5+, and i somehow have this feel that the grain is smaller or less visible, may be completely objectively wrong. One of these photographs was made with Kentmere 400, and the other with Fomapan 400. Because Fomapan is a classic, old-school type of emulsion, its performance in 135 format is what youd more or less expect when shot in the much smaller frame size of 35mm film, which in a word, a bit grainy. If you enjoyed my work here you can find more of it over on my Instagram. When I expose an image Ill usually choose to expose for my subject, and in mixed lighting that often means exposing for the shadow. Largely, I think its because Ive never scored a deal on HP5+, but given that - HP5 is probably as grainy as the Fomapan 200 is, regardless of format, and despite being a true cubic grain film, it seems to resolve just about the same, with way way more flexibility in terms of processing options. I guess that having used it for so long is also a factor, but I have a lot of confidence in Kentmere 400. Rollei retro 400s/FX-39ii development time, Portra 400 35mm in-stock at Free Style (USA). Thank you! Press?? Exposure: 1/500 @ F5.6 (Y2 filter and rubber lens hood) Film: Fomapan 200 Creative dev. Out of all the films I tested, I felt Tri-X had the best balance of contrast overall. Ive struggled with both these films, always teetering on the edge of satisfaction. After digitizing the negatives I import the files into Lightroom, do some basic exposure adjustment, then finish the editing process in Photoshop. Display as a link instead, And believe me, they are crummy. Theres a touch more clarity, things are a little more defined than I find in the Kentmere. My experiences with both of these films has been through sharp lenses Leica, Zeiss, Nikon, some of the most reputable lenses for sharpness every produced. ago. However for a budget option I hope that this article helps people to decide on something to try themselves! You can post now and register later. So which is the better film? When it comes to Fomapan film, results and opinions are mixed. I've managed to tame it a bit with homemade Microdol 1:3 BTW Although development is slow, like 25-30 minutes at 75F with 30 second agitation. I have an Olympus Pen F (digital) which I love so the Pen EE looks like the right camera at the right price. The Kentmere is the real all rounder. Both films are a solid choice - try both and see which you like better! Fomapan gives a high contrast result in most situations, including even/overcast light. The question isn't "is HP5 $20 better than Foma", but rather "do I value my work to the tune of $20". je nach Charge musste mal um ne Minute variiert werden, das wars dann aber auch. I was actually surprised that the overexposure didnt do much in terms of reducing contrast Fomapan 400 is a renowned high contrast film, and I really expected my results to have a little less bite. It is, I believe, well known that Foma is a go-to choice for relabeled black-and-white film stocks, and evidence suggests that three of FPPs monster films are actually Fomapan 100, 200 and 400 respectively (the fourth appears to be Orwo UN54). Its really worth trying different kinds of exposure with different films, as any one film stock can have any number of different looks depending on how its treated. Fomapan on the other hand seems underexposed when shot at box speed. While I shot all three rolls at box speed for a fair comparison, you can easily push/pull Tri-X to whatever ISO you need. I dont think this had anything to do with overexposure since my F100 is usually pretty consistent in matrix metering mode. Fomapan 400 is the fastest emulsion in Foma Bohemias line of films. If thats the look youre going for, it may satisfy you, but I personally prefer Ilford Delta 100 for 35mm photography, and in terms of classic style emulsions, I even find that I prefer Kentmere 100 in 35mm to Fomapan. Give good old Kodak Tri-X a workout. Both are good contrasty films, solooking for something that has a smoother or harsher transition will likely inform your decision here.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-banner-1','ezslot_14',185,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-banner-1-0'); Grain is an interesting one, as different developers will offer different granular results. That being said, settling on using it as a 200 means that Ill shoot it less frequently, reserving it for spring/summer use. Analog Workflow Forums (100% Analog/Traditional). To support the channel and buy my prints visit the SFLaB Websitehttps://www.rogerlowe.co.ukWant more content?Why not become a member! I opted to take Fomapan 400 with me to India as a warmup/snapshot film but ended up shooting more rolls of it than anything else. A thorough article and greatly appreciated. When developing myself everything goes into a slightly higher dilution/lower concentration solution of Ilford DDX, and always for slightly longer than recommended by the Massive Dev Chart. Honestly, if money is that big an object or is the sole criteria, then just steal TMY2 or TriX. Thanks again for another informative article. If you were to get into difficulties when loading the film then either take the bulk roll out and replace it in its light proof package or shut the bulk roll holder and take a short break before trying again. in Atomal49 1+2 kam er noch differentierter und mit schnen Grauwerten. All photographs and text appearing on 35mmc.com are the exclusive property of the named author (except where stated otherwise) and are protected by copyright. My conclusion is that in comparison between two box speed 400 films the Kentmere wins outright. Its not a popular developer for some reason but its cheap as chips and delivers a fine grain. Kodak Tri-X 400 is a classic, and was the first film I started shooting with back in college. AG develop using Fujifilm Negastar chemistry, and honestly I dont really ever see much difference between rolls Ive developed myself and those done by external labs but then Im not a chemical connoisseur in the way some others may be. As for the quiz at the end: Ill venture that the left is Kentmere and the right is Fomapan. Great article Simon! Thanks for the through writeup Simon. In their world, it was imperative to get the shot (a few were still using 45 press cameras) so each step of the process carried equal weight: exposure, developing, printing. Fomapan 400 can also be used for street work in dull conditions or in areas where you want to show off a bit more crunch to go with urban decay. Id also highly recommend Kentmere 100, which I didnt test here but still make use of quite often. Here are a few examples of shots Ive taken with Fomapan 400 Action, 200 Creative, and 100 Classic. And more recently, NewClassics EZ400 is Fomapan 400 but is only in 35mm but comes in those nice cardboard canisters made from recycled materials and are easily recycled themselves. Fomapan 400 does well with Fomadon LQN and pretty good with HC-110 in my experience. 1. I love your city scenes. It has more highlight bleed and halation than Kentmere, but this is rarely overwhelming in the way it may be on something like Cinestill 800t. JavaScript is disabled. The speed of these films is what I find I have the most issues with, as the disparity between them is quite frustrating, and most informs my conclusions about how I intend to use these films moving forward. 3 Retropan 320 Shot through Franka Sollida II. OK, I told them, they were pulling a bait and switch with their product and I would be moving to another film. Both are unique and can not replace the other. document.getElementById("ak_js_1").setAttribute("value",(new Date()).getTime()); This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. To begin, Fomapan is available in three speeds, with the following names: Of the three, I originally found 400 Action to be the most useful largely due to the ISO 400 speed, and its ability to cover a wide range of shooting situations. Ill have to try it now; thanks for the recommendation! And the best part is that you can get Fomapan 400 in medium format and sheet film. The recurring points here pretty much nail it: HP5+ is a more consistently quality film that pushes much better. Ich mchte einen klassischen Film verwenden, die Tmax und Deltas fallen also raus. Kodak Trix 400 in Rodinal. I may try Fomapan as you did at EI=200. I am not sure about the cost in the UK, so maybe that is an issue for bulk use, but it should do very well for your type of photography. Find out more about 35mmc here. Although these werent excessively 100, incident meter, added a stop for bellows extension, at f/45 got 6 seconds, increased to 43 sec for reciprocity failure. I recently wrote a 5 Frames With Fomapan 400 where I described the results shot at EI1600 with a 2 stop push. Definitely a characterful film with quirks, and requiring experimentation before a user can be comfortable with what it offers. But the real issue for me is that I am about to try bulk loading for the first time, so there is a possibility that I will lose it all. But not everyone wants to limit this film to over-exposure and pull development. Kentmere seems to be accurately rated at 400, and Ive never been inclined to shoot it over/under, or even to push or pull it. I take my results at 400 and, more often than not, am happy with them. Fomapan on the other hand seems underexposed when shot at box speed. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. 5 Reasons Why You Should Try Fomapan 200. And one further note here. The golden rule of film photography is to shoot for the shadows and develop for the highlights, however Id caution overexposing this film too much. Some great shots here, but the man smoking in the bus is just terrific. Fomapan 400, exposed for the wall/tent light. However it absolutely shines as a character film when over exposed I really do believe it to make more sense as a 200/300ish speed as many online similarly claim. Simon, nice job! All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere. Its a traditional grain and very contrasty. I personally have a love/hate relationship with Tri-X because no matter what I do, the grain is always hit or miss when scanning. I just dont shoot enough film to make the price per roll very relevant, but I think youd be hard pressed to find a B&W film in this price range that performs this well. If everything goes well I will save up some pennies for an Olympus Pen FT. So this post is very helpful many thanks. mit Bewegung ging es dann immer zu schnell und das Korn war zurck. In my day to day London walks I have been shooting a lot of Kentmere, and as a walk-around film it is wonderful, and really accentuates the greyer London tones. Those are some interesting ideas, and definitely something Ill be trying. I really disliked Fomapan 400. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere. They werent having any of that artsy stuff. It is a bit of a marmite film that gives some very different results depending on the use case. Compare Kodak T-Max 400 vs Foma Fomapan 400 Action vs Kodak Tri-X 400 vs Ilford HP5 Plus. Yes, in that case you would be cutting into the film speed a bit, but you could still get more of the look you like while shooting the film you prefer. Tri-X at 320 is a wonderful look but one roll at 35mm is twice the price of Fomapan, sometimes even more than half! for Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers In my case, Ive had plenty of experience with Fomapan films, either shooting directly by the Fomapan brand or through one of the multitudes of rebrands of the film stock. The images made with that extra stop of light were enough to allow me to settle for [], [] The images above all felt under exposed. All photographs and text appearing on 35mmc.com are the exclusive property of the named author (except where stated otherwise) and are protected by copyright. (meine Frau sagt ja, das sei alles nur Voodoo und dass man das mit dem Kippen auch getrost bleiben lassen oder komplett bertreiben kann. Id like to be able to shoot 400 speed films either dead on as much as possible, and to use the latitude when in tricky situations to go slightly under when necessary. I started off with HC-110 but found the dilutions impractical for most film I shot. Some people maintain that it has that vintage TriX feel from the 60s. Ill meter Fomapan 400 for the shadows when I think theres maybe a three-four stop difference between shadow and highlight, any higher and Ill expose slightly further up. November 20, 2019. Id leave the sharpening to Photoshop. You are using an out of date browser. ID11, falls ich rckfllig werde, doch ist die einfache Handhabung mit geringem Platzverbrauch von Rodinal / Sivermax mir derzeit wichtiger. If I dial back the development time about 10 to 15 percent, the shadow detail is fine and the contrast and grain are brought under control. Especially if Im working at a reenacting event. aber eigentlich wird das nix. ", the paintings, the drawings, the photographs. Yep, there are many reviews of Foma 400 on the net, and they often say that, shot at box speed and developed as recommended, its grainy, contrasty and lacks shadow detail, which is what pushed film looks like.I shoot a lot of it, all at 200. Its siblings include Fomapan 100 and Fomapan 200, plus a Retropan 320 film that was introduced just a few years ago. Kodak prices, in particular, vary from one supplier to another, but as I write this Analogue Wonderland are selling Fomapan 400 for 4, Tri-X is 9.75 and T-Max 400 is 10.50. Except that if things go wrong then the monetary loss is greater with the more expensive film. A couple of years ago, I spent the summer shooting different B&W films. Now we have a dilemma, my one roll experiment seems to be telling me that the Fomapan 400 is not a bad film for my taste the issue comes that reviews of this film are absolutely all over the place. As of October 2021, Tri-X will run you $9.95 a roll for 36 exposures. Fomapan 400 is one of those polarising films, either you love it or hate it, and even those who love the film have mixed opinions. Sometimes this grittiness fits your subject - Ill often choose Tri-X when shooting at former military bases because of the grain alone. Content contributor - become a part of the worlds biggest film and alternative photography community blog. I tried Foma 400 and to be honest, I am not happy with it. As a winter/autumn all rounder the Kentmere is serving me well, and Fomapan as a high-light film makes a lot of sense. Thanks Peter!I deliberately chose frames with similar tones so it would be a bit trickier.The one of the left is the Fomapan. These are terrific. However the overall effect is actually quite muddy, and unpleasing to my eye, whereas the Fomapan in the same condition is undeniably less detailed, but results in a nicer image (in my opinion).if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[336,280],'35mmc_com-box-4','ezslot_11',182,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-4-0'); Kentmere 400, exposed for the dappled light. ehrlich gesagt habe ich keine Ahnung. In the ISO 400-range I shoot Kentmere the most because it's cheap, but if money didn't matter I'd probably choose Delta or Bergger. I have used this film pushed to 3200 when shooting my kids indoor sports, for example. Simply register for free here We are always happy to welcome new members! Alternativ knnte man auch einen 400er in dem Silvermax- Entwickler mal eintesten. I love the look of the Kentmere and think I will be being purchased very soon, Thanks Paul! als der Silvermax darin ebenso mit guten Ergebnissen entwickeln lassen. Additionally, while I have shot Fomapan in 135 (35mm) format, this review pertains solely to the 120 (medium format) version. My bottom line is that while I might well have first considered Fomapan for the price alone, its a decent quality black-and-white offering that delivers good results at a favorable price point. Push Fomapan 400. Film Photography Podcast and News Shoot Some Film, Dang it! in Compard R09 Spezial. Update: December 30, 2020While keeping the original pricing at the time of writing in-place, added prices as of December 2020. For your last two pictures I can only guess. Added additional sample images. That could be quite a difference. I get where you are coming from. by visiting our affiliates! Wenn ich mich fr nur einen Entwickler entscheiden mte: D76. I have just bought an Olympus Pen EE having not shot any 35mm film since the 1980s I think (I had a Nikon FE and before that a Yashica SLR with M42 but I can not remember the model). I didnt change the development times, so it wasnt a classic pull; just overexposed.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[728,90],'35mmc_com-box-3','ezslot_1',179,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-3-0'); I think that under these conditions the film really came into its own. Fomapan 400, metered for the batons. 21 Grad, 19 Minuten AGFA in R1+50 haben bei mir 640 ASA gebracht. Ich wrde einen HP5 nehmen und unter 20C bleiben. Can you talk about what developers you used? Kentmere is a low contrast film which leaves you a lot of room to work in the shadows, and turns out great when developed in DD-X. Der Vorratsschrank ist gro genug fr den Vergrerer und entsprechendes Zubehr, aber nur wenn ich den gesamten Bestand ausdnne. Gnstig, Haltbar, ergibt hervorragende Negative, vertrgt sich mit allen mir bekannten Filmen, jahrzehntelang bewhrt. [] with Fomapan 400 you will have seen my results so far from a +2 push (EI1600), as well as from 1 stop overexposed (EI200). Excuse the scanner artefacts looking directly at the negatives, there is perhaps a very small difference in the darker areas of the sky, but this is marginal, so marginal in fact that I am not really sure you can call a winner. That stuff came in handy as I dabbled in that artsy stuff. . Fomapan 400 can also be used for street work in dull conditions or in areas where you want to show off a bit more crunch to go with urban decay. I can definitely see that whereas the Kentmere 400 is tried and tested, seems to give consistent results, as I have personally found, and is generally quite well respected as a cheaper 400 film, the Fomapan 400 is divisive. Thank you Daniel! 2. Working on a budget? If you prefer yourself, it is possibble to give formula? Ive shot Tri-X before, but my preference is HP5+! Update: November 28, 2021Updated pricing references and made a few minor edits. I absolutely understand that for someone looking for a lower grain and more of a modern look the Fomapan emulsion isnt going to work, but then, I am not really sure that the Kentmere 400 would meet this requirement either neither of these films wins in that department. for Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers; Press?? Although these werent excessively bad I think Ill be sticking to other films for my standard low light/push options especially HP5. FrancoCJanuary 9, 2015 in Analog-Forum, Hallo, eine neue Bestellung von Filmen steht mal wieder an. ich vermute aber, dass ich das wild gemixt habe. My negatives always look really dull. Some people love them; others cant stand them. Just out of curiosity, which developer/dilution did you use to process the film? Im not an authority on development my interest lies in the shooting experience, and for me this ends when the shutter is pressed. It provides a grittier look than other Kodak films (specifically T-Max 400). Ive always liked the look Ive been getting, and can definitely see a uniqueness from HP5 and Tri-X. Der 100/21 Silvermax in Silvermax Entwickler entspricht genau dem was ich suchte. Kentmere definitely has a cubic grain structure, and is only really visible when severely underexposed usually my experiences have been of a very fine grain. I mentioned in the Workflow section that the bulk of work shown was in either DDX or Fujifilm chemistry. If I could only have one it would be the Ilford for its bulletproof reliability. Ive experimented with Foma quite a bit to get results that I feel represent the best possible look from this film. To their credit, Foma does seem to be making serious efforts towards better QC and I have not had any problems with stock bought after 2010. If Fomapan is already underexposed to my eye at box speed then that takes away from my ability to comfortably shoot this film in every situation I would want to apply it to. Happy shooting! Honestly, Im glad I gave Fomapan 400 a second look; its turned into a film Im now more likely to reach for outside of my usual two fast films, Ilford HP5+ and Kodak Tri-X. Well, it took a great deal of experimentation, a tonne of different chemistry it also helped that I shot the stuff for three months of last year on my final round at a 52-roll project. Vor Korn habe ich keine Angst, solange kein 80 Schleifpapier Look entsteht. Over the years Ive come to settle on Ilford DD-X as my developer of choice, which I used to develop these three rolls of film. I want to see what a film or lens does on the street or around people. Easy to introduce texture in those areas in a print just by flashing the paper beforehand, if that is something that perticularly worried anyone who doesnt want any areas of pure white on their image. Hi Simon,thanks for the comparison. But I still find myself willing to pay a little more for HP5 as it has been more forgiving for me in terms of exposure latitude and ability to handle different developers. In the photo of a hotel, why is a young lady climbing into a window?? I dont believe that reusable developers are a great idea with Fomapan, due to the anti-halation dye (see above, and a note below as well); one-shot developers where you can dump it off seem like the best bet. I am retired and still do not have enough time to photograph, let alone experiment with different films. Thanks! 35mmc is a blog authored, edited and published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers. Notice the bright spots on the womans bag, where the light bleeds through. I want to ask a question about developer; What kind of developer was used? Your previous content has been restored. It is nice to know that detail is there, especially if I was thinking of taking this negative to the dark room and might want to pull it out in some of those areas: I take most of my photos outside in standard British weather, and I need a film that can be under or over exposed occasionally and still give results that I can get acceptable images from.

Solar Flare Effects On Humans, David R Fortney Net Worth, Articles F